In addition to high-profile ballot measures on the gas tax and rent control, voters Tuesday will weigh in on nine other statewide ballot questions, covering issues ranging from housing bonds to animal cages.

The list of statewide measures also includes questions about whether California should continue to adhere to Daylight Saving Time and whether financial restrictions should be imposed on kidney dialysis clinics.

Here is a rundown of the ballot measures:

— Proposition 1 is a $4 billion bond measure to fund housing programs benefiting low-income residents and veterans. The measure would earmark $1.5 billion for multi-family housing for low-income Californians, along with $1 billion to help veterans purchase homes or farms. It would also provide $450 million for “infill” and transit-oriented projects, $300 million for farmworker housing and $300 million for manufactured and mobile homes. According to the state, the bond issue would cost roughly $170 million annually for 35 years.

— Proposition 2 would authorize the sale of $2 billion in bonds, repaid with funds from the 2004 Mental Health Services Act, to provide housing and mental health services for the homeless.

— Proposition 3 is a nearly $8.9 billion bond measure aimed at funding a variety of water projects. The measure would bankroll projects targeting water quality, water delivery, groundwater storage, fish and wildlife habitats and dam and reservoir repair. According to the state, the bonds would cost about $430 million annually over the next 40 years to repay.

— Proposition 4 is a $1.5 billion bond measure to fund construction, expansion and equipment for children’s hospitals across the state, including Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Miller Children’s Hospital in Long Beach and Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego. Funds would also be provided to children’s hospitals at University of California medical campuses, including UCLA, UC Irvine and UC San Diego. The repayment cost is estimated at $80 million annually for 35 years.

— Proposition 5 would extend property tax relief measures to homeowners who are severely disabled or aged 55 or older, eliminating the so-called “moving penalty” incurred when people move into a new home.

— Proposition 7 would allow the state Legislature, on a two-thirds vote, to opt out of Daylight Saving Time, or to make it permanent, eliminating the need for Californians to change their clocks twice a year. Proponents call it a health measure, saying the time changes disrupt sleep and raise the risk of heart attack and stroke. But opponents say it will put the state “out of sync” with most of the nation.

— Proposition 8 would limit the amount kidney dialysis clinics can charge patients, restricting the charges primarily to direct patient care and quality improvements. It would also require clinics to rebate money it collects in a given year over a specified cap. Proponents claim some clinics wildly overcharge patients without investing in quality care, putting patients’ health at risk. Opponents, however, claim the measure’s financial restrictions will force community dialysis clinics to close, making it more difficult for patients to undergo treatment or forcing them to go to hospital emergency rooms.

— Proposition 11 would require private ambulance crews to remain on call to respond to emergencies even while they are on legally required meal or rest breaks. Backers of the measure say it will ensure the fastest response to emergency calls by ensuring the closest crew responds, even if the crew is on break at the time. Opponents say that by eliminating breaks, the measure will result in over-worked crews that won’t be fully effective when they respond to calls.

— Proposition 12 would establish specific size requirements for cages or pens that house egg-laying hens, breeding pigs or veal calves. It would also require egg-laying hens to be raised in a cage-free environment beginning in 2022. Proponents call the measure a simple issue of preventing animal cruelty by ensuring the animals are not penned in overly restrictive cages. Opponents claim the measure doesn’t add any new protection for animals beyond what voters approved a decade ago, and actually delays for seven years the cage-free requirement that voters already approved.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.