A community meeting will be held Wednesday to give the public a chance to comment on Los Angeles County’s efforts to fight homelessness.
Plans call for more than 40 draft strategies — the result of policy summits held between October and December of last year — to be discussed, with residents having an opportunity to comment on the proposals.
The meeting comes one day after the Board of Supervisors voted to conduct its own analysis of a state proposal to invest $2 billion in permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless individuals with mental illness. A bipartisan group of California senators is backing the legislation, dubbed No Place Like Home, which aims to repurpose Proposition 63 funds to create a $2 billion construction bond.
Proposition 63 or the Mental Health Services Act, which went into effect in 2005, levies a 1 percent tax on personal income of more than $1 million to support mental health services. The details of the state proposal are still a work in progress.
Supervisors Mark Ridley-Thomas and Sheila Kuehl recommended the analysis in a motion that stated, “It is imperative that (the) county is at the table to fully vet this proposal,” as roughly 40 percent of California’s homeless population lives in Los Angeles County.
“We should do everything we can to make sure we get more, rather than less, from this effort,” Ridley-Thomas told the board. “This will help us in our work of trying to lift up our community and restoring dignity and purpose to the lives of individuals who find themselves homeless.”
Kuehl said the county’s analysis could help frame how funds will be allocated and offer “a real win-win by protecting mental health services while supporting the use of a portion of the revenues from Prop. 63 for housing.”
The board directed staffers to make sure the analysis includes a comparison of the benefits of the initiative to those of existing MHSA-funded efforts. Staffers will also work to identify the subset of homeless individuals in L.A. County that could be helped by No Place Like Home and assess how the legislation would affect current programs.
—City News Service
>> Want to read more stories like this? Get our Free Daily Newsletters Here!Follow us: