A pianist is asking a judge to deny Danny Elfman’s motion to dismiss her defamation lawsuit against the “Beetlejuice” composer, arguing in new court papers that her case does not infringe on his First Amendment rights and that his 2023 magazine comments have damaged her career.
Plaintiff Nomi Abadi’s Los Angeles Superior Court complaint against Elfman pertains to remarks he made during a July 2023 Rolling Stone interview. Elfman’s denials of Abadi’s allegations of repeated sexual harassment and misconduct were included in an investigative piece about a settlement he made with his former mentee.
“The motion should be granted and this harassing and outrageous complaint dismissed,” according to court papers filed in October by Elfman attorney Camille M. Vasquez, who represented Johnny Depp in his dueling litigation with former spouse Amber Heard.
But in court papers filed Monday with Judge Gail Killefer, Abadi states in a sworn declaration that her claims are well-founded.
“My five years of hard work building a career in film composing has been destroyed as a result of Mr. Elfman’s blatantly false statements about me in the Rolling Stone article,” Abadi says. “His actions have forced me to abandon my dreams of film scoring to pursue other opportunities.”
Abadi, who contends Elfman had a fetish about nudity that included driving without clothing, says she suffers from severe emotional distress.
“I have been diagnosed with anxiety and depression and the humiliation, stress and fear for my personal safety have compounded these feelings, which collectively have had a profoundly negative impact on my personal life,” Abadi further contends.
Abadi’s application to the Association of Women Film Composers mentorship program was denied with no explanation after the publication of the magazine article, according to the plaintiff, who further maintains that exclusion from the program resulted in the loss for her of more composing opportunities.
According to Vasquez’s court papers, the intermittent friendship between Elfman and Abadi ended in political disagreements related to the 2016 presidential elections when Abadi insisted that voter fraud gave Hillary Clinton the Democratic nomination over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
In an attempt at humor, and partly to defuse their disagreement with a joke, Elfman in August 2016 filled a cocktail glass with various cleaning products from his bathroom counter, including the facial cleanser Cetaphil, to mimic a cocktail full of nasal drainage, all intended to be a joke about a cocktail he would like to serve then-President Trump, according to Vasquez’s pleadings.
Once Abadi’s romantic aspirations were dashed, the plaintiff turned on Elfman and made up a story that he had “behaved inappropriately around her,” according to Vasquez’s court papers.
The 71-year-old Elfman weighed in on the motion with a sworn declaration filed with Killefer, who is scheduled to hear the anti-SLAPP motion on Dec. 10. The state’s anti-SLAPP — Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation — law is intended to prevent people from using courts, and potential threats of a lawsuit, to intimidate those who are exercising their First Amendment rights.
Elfman says the nasal drainage was not meant to have a sexual connotation.
“The cocktail was intended to look disgusting, like a cocktail glass full of snot,” Elfman said. “I acknowledge that this joke was juvenile, but it was not intended to be sexual and it did not contain any bodily fluid.”
Elfman further says that when Abadi failed at an attempt to renew their friendship, she “made a decision to commit herself to my destruction.”