The Los Angeles City Council Friday approved a proposal to explore the implementation of fees for non-city residents participating in programs, activities or classes organized by the Department of Recreation and Parks.
In a 14-0 vote, council asked city staff to report on the feasibility of establishing non-resident fees. The report would offer insight into fee structures used by other major California cities, projected revenues, and a legal analysis of such a program.
Councilman Bob Blumenfield was absent during the vote.
Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez introduced the motion in October 2025, which was seconded by Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky.
The Department of Recreation and Parks operates one of the “most extensive municipal recreation and parks systems across the country” with more than 450 parks, 180 recreation centers, 60 swimming pools and 13 golf courses, according to the motion.
The motion notes that some cities implement a system that differentiates between city residents and non-city residents in their recreation and park programming to ensure fair cost recovery, and to prioritize access for their own residents.
Pasadena placed a fee on non-city residents who participate in recreation programs, swim lessons and facility rentals.
San Francisco also charges non-residents for youth enrichment and camp programs, as well as for non-resident pool rentals. Similarly, Cupertino imposes higher non-city resident rates for the use of athletic field rentals and recreation classes.
“Establishing non-city resident fees for RAP activities and programs would allow the department to reinvest additional revenue back into the recreation system, such as supporting the long-term sustainability of programming, enhancing service delivery, and ensuring continued affordability for Los Angeles residents,” the motion reads.
City officials are exploring new ways to raise revenue — after closing a $1 billion deficit and averting 1,600 layoffs last year.
In 2025, the city raised trash pick-up, sewage and parking meter fees. City officials are expected to present proposed tax measures as a way to boost funds for the Los Angeles Fire Department and the general fund, which supports basic city services.