As promised, Sheriff Alex Villanueva failed to appear at Thursday’s meeting of the county Civilian Oversight Commission, even though he was sent a subpoena ordering his presence, and the commission voted to challenge his defiance in court.

Villanueva told reporters Wednesday he had no intention of attending the meeting.

“Regarding the commission’s subpoena, you have to understand … the subpoena, Measure R, the ordinance enacted by the Board of Supervisors, all these things were generated without any oversight, without any third-party independent legal analysis of its constitutionality,” Villanueva said. “That still remains in doubt, and until that issue is resolved I will not be adhering to any subpoena issued by either entity — be it the inspector general or the Oversight Commission.”

As promised by the sheriff, his department was represented at Thursday’s meeting by Assistant Sheriff Bruce Chase, who Villanueva said “volunteered his time to go and testify to the commission and give them an update on all the COVID-19 efforts we are engaged in.”

Chase promised the watchdog agency his cooperation on behalf of the department going forward and said he would appear at the next meeting.

“It’s important for us to keep you posted and keep you advised,” Chase said.

Commission Chair Patti Giggans, executive director of Peace Over Violence, said Villanueva was challenging the legality of Measure R, which grants subpoena power to the commission and was approved by voters in March. Subpoena power was first granted to the commission by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors earlier this year.

Commissioner Robert Bonner, a former U.S. attorney, made a motion to take all legal action necessary to compel the sheriff to comply with the subpoena and made clear that his failure to do so could be punishable by contempt.

“We need to move forward promptly,” Bonner said. “We can’t just allow the status quo to stand.”

The commission’s vote on the motion was unanimous.

Villanueva said Wednesday his department is committed to being as transparent as possible with the commission and the public, with information from the agency shared through the Transparency Project online resource.

“All the information that can legally be provided to the commission, to anybody, is always going to be available online. I want people to decide for themselves without any interference or middlemen,” the sheriff said.

Villanueva questioned the motives behind the subpoena.

“If the transparency is being provided and the information is provided, what exactly is the purpose of the subpoena?” he asked. “If they are engaged in a public shaming endeavor, which it looks like at face value, well they are sadly mistaken. We are not going to be participating in that. If it is an issue about providing information so the Oversight Commission can do their job, by all means we will give them all the information we can legally give them.”

The commission used its newly granted subpoena power for the first time after Villanueva did not attend or send a representative to a third consecutive meeting. The subpoena ordered Villanueva and his representatives to attend the commission’s Thursday meeting.

“We’re not doing it frivolously,” Giggans said Thursday.

Giggans had said earlier that the sheriff’s participation was even more important during the coronavirus crisis.

“The meetings now conducted virtually twice a month due to the critical COVID-19 crisis are very well attended by the public. We are in a pandemic which calls for more oversight, more collaboration, more input into policy, not less. The role of the sheriff’s Civilian Oversight Commission is a public mandate and one that every commissioner takes seriously.”

Commissioners had hoped to question Villanueva Thursday and during their last meeting about how his department was handling coronavirus cases in the county jail system, issues that were addressed by Chase Thursday.

After the last meeting, Brian K. Williams, executive director of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission, said the sheriff’s absence was a rebuke to more than the commissioners.

“This is the third meeting in a row where the sheriff’s department has not been represented, this is unfair to the commission, the community and the men and women of the sheriff’s department whose voice we also need to hear,” Williams said.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *