Hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters began an “occupation” of USC’s Alumni Park Wednesday and issued a list of demands — including university divestment from organizations that “profit from Israeli apartheid, genocide and occupation in Palestine” — and the campus was closed to unauthorized visitors following clashes with campus security officers.
The occupation action added USC to a growing list of college campuses across the nation that have seen encampments and protests over the Israel-Hamas war, most notably Columbia University. USC’s Alumni Park is scheduled to host the university’s already headline-making commencement ceremony on May 10.
Organizers of the USC occupation — identifying themselves as the USC Divest from Death Coalition — issued a statement saying the action is “in solidarity with the people of Palestine as they resist genocide and continue in their struggle for liberation.”
“The occupation is also in resistance to attempts by USC and other universities to suppress the student movement for Palestine on its campuses, in resistance to the silencing of students that criticize the state of Israel, in resistance to the university administrators and boards of trustees who profit off the genocide of Palestinians,” organizers said.
It was unclear how many people participating in the action were actually USC students or affiliated with the university. USC Provost Andrew Guzman issued a statement Wednesday afternoon saying the university had closed campus gates and taken other actions to “restrict growth of the protest and keep the rest of the campus calm.”
“Until further notice, (the university is) restricting unauthorized visitors from entering campus,” Guzman wrote. “Individuals with proper USC identification or verifiable business purpose will be able to access campus, attend classes and participate in activities.”
Several dozen people began the encampment early Wednesday morning. Campus Department of Public Safety officers visited the encampment and instructed participants not to hang signs, flags or other materials from trees and posts in the park, and warned them not to use megaphones.
Protesters at times broke into chants of “Free Palestine.”
Around midday, campus DPS officers again moved into the park in an effort to confiscate prohibited items, such as microphones and tents. Some shouting matches between protesters and officers ensued, and some students picked up their tents and carried them around the park to prevent them from being confiscated.
As the standoff intensified and officers tried to detain a protester, hundreds of people amassed around a DPS patrol vehicle, chanting and shoving forward. The group ultimately moved back into Alumni Park and began marching and shouting slogans, while some DPS officers formed a small skirmish line on the outskirts of the park. The person who had been detained was released.
Los Angeles Police Department units also responded to the campus, but as of mid-afternoon, it did not appear that any LAPD officers had actually entered the campus. The officers were mainly gathered on streets surrounding the campus.
An LAPD helicopter was spotted hovering overhead.
There were no reports of any arrests or injuries.
In his statement Wednesday afternoon, Guzman noted that the university has a ban on erecting tents or other encampments on the campus, along with a ban on the “use of loudspeakers, signs on poles or stakes and the disruption of classes and other essential functions of the university.”
Guzman said that the protest participants — “many of whom doe not appear to be affiliated with USC” — were repeatedly asked to adhere to the campus rules by removing tents and other prohibited items.
“In each case, protesters refused,” Guzman said. “Their actions have escalated to the point of confrontation and have threatened the safety of our officers and campus community.”
Some Jewish students interviewed by media on campus said they feared for their safety, accusing the crowd of shouting antisemitic slogans as they protested.
“We want to be clear that we reject speech that is hateful and that causes harm to others,” Guzman wrote in his statement. “In these challenging times, we call on the Trojan Family to remember that every member of our community is deserving of respect, has the right to be safe on campus, take classes, and participate in other campus activities without fear of harassment or bullying. It should be everyone’s priority to treat each other with kindness and care.”
Guzman’s statement did not address any of the demands put forth by protest organizers.
Those demands included a complete academic boycott of Israel, including an end to study-abroad programs in the area and cutting ties with Israeli universities; protection of free speech of students voicing support for Palestine; and demanding the university issue a public statement “calling for an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza, denouncing the ongoing genocidal campaign against the Palestinian people and call on government officials to do so too.”
USC made national headlines in recent weeks over its decision to bar pro-Palestinian valedictorian Asna Tabassum from speaking during the May 10 commencement ceremony. The move came following complaints about some of Tabassum’s online posts, including a link to a website advocating the abolition of Israel.
University officials insisted the decision was done not for political reasons, but due to security concerns, given the “alarming tenor” of the discourse over the issue of Tabassum. Organizations including the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Los Angeles and the ACLU of Southern California have denounced the decision and demanded the university reverse course and allow Tabassum to speak.
On Friday, USC announced that it is “redesigning the commencement program,” and it will no longer include any outside speakers or honorees.
Filmmaker Jon M. Chu had been scheduled to be the main commencement speaker during the May 10 event. Honorary degrees were expected to be presented to Chu, National Endowment for the Arts chair Maria Rosario Jackson, tennis legend Billie Jean King and National Academy of Sciences President Marcia McNutt.
The university said it will “confer these honorary degrees at a future commencement or other academic ceremonies.”
“Given the highly publicized circumstances surrounding our main-stage commencement program, university leadership has decided it is best to release our outside speakers and honorees from attending this year’s ceremony,” according to a message sent to the USC community Friday afternoon. “We’ve been talking to this exceptional group and hope to confer these honorary degrees at a future commencement or other academic ceremonies.
“… It is important that our full attention be on our remarkable graduates. We will be celebrating their accomplishments in a way that reflects the unity we love so much about our Trojan Family. In addition to a memorable main-stage ceremony, we also will be hosting the 38 satellite ceremonies, five celebrations, and 65 receptions, featuring dozens of students, other internal and external speakers and performers.”
Also on Friday, 11 members of the university’s Advisory Committee on Muslim Life at USC resigned in protest over the Tabassum issue. The group is scheduled to hold a news conference Thursday.
Last Thursday, hundreds of people — including students and some university staff — took part in a march and rally on the USC campus to protest the decision not to allow Tabassum to speak at commencement.
Tabassum said in a statement that “anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian voices have subjected me to a campaign of racist hatred because of my uncompromising belief in human rights for all.”
“… I am both shocked by this decision and profoundly disappointed that the university is succumbing to a campaign of hate meant to silence my voice,” she said. “I am not surprised by those who attempt to propagate hatred. I am surprised that my own university — my home for four years — has abandoned me.”
Guzman insisted in his original message announcing the decision that barring Tabassum from speaking in no way diminished “the remarkable academic achievements of any student considered or selected for valedictorian. To be clear: this decision has nothing to do with freedom of speech. There is no free-speech entitlement to speak at a commencement. The issue here is how best to maintain campus security and safety, period.”
He added, “The intensity of feelings, fueled by both social media and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, has grown to include many voices outside of USC and has escalated to the point of creating substantial risks relating to security and disruption at commencement. We cannot ignore the fact that similar risks have led to harassment and even violence at other campuses.”