Major changes that would lower the bar for what is required of candidates to receive taxpayer matching campaign funds were recommended Tuesday by a Los Angeles City Council committee, although its members decided against lowering the amount a council candidate would need to raise to the level sought by dozens of community organizations.

The Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee recommended that City Council candidates would need to raise at least $20,000 in donations to qualify for matching funds, which is a reduction from $25,000, but not the $11,500 Councilman Mike Bonin recommended in an amendment in October.

An ordinance solidifying the changes is scheduled for a vote by the full City Council on Wednesday, the last meeting before the holiday recess. Council President Herb Wesson said he wanted the alterations on the books so that they would apply to a special election in June that will likely be scheduled for the soon-to-be-vacant seat of Councilman Mitchell Englander, who announced recently that he is stepping down at the end of the year to take a job in the private sector.

Wesson said he wanted the lowered amount to “ensure that this door has been opened that has been closed for so long,” although he said he wanted the Ethics Commission to vet and make recommendations where it relates to citywide offices and the council elections that could apply beyond the June special election.

The committee also approved a motion that would schedule the special election to fill Englander’s seat in Council District 12 for June 4.

Bonin and dozens of organizations have called for the required level to be reduced to $11,500 for City Council candidates, arguing that other big cities, including Washington, D.C., and New York City, have thresholds that are far lower than L.A.

“If you don’t pass the Bonin amendment, you might as well call this the incumbency protection act,” Rob Quan with Unrig LA told the committee. “Far too many people view elections about outcomes only without appreciating the actual process, the full exercise of democracy. If you don’t pass the Bonin amendment, you limit our discourse, who gets engaged and who gets heard.”

Another rule change recommended by the committee is eliminating the need for candidates to get signatures in order to quality for matching funds.

Currently, qualified candidates who collect 500 valid signatures — which is also the number required to qualify for the ballot — during the nominating petition process receive a match rate of 1:1 in the primary and the general election, and qualified candidates who collect 1,000 valid signatures receive a match rate of 2:1 in the primary and 4:1 in the general.

The proposed new rules would let all qualified candidates receive a match rate of 6:1 in the primary and the general, and the total amount candidates can receive in matching funds would also increase. For City Council candidates, the amount would increase from $100,000 in the primary and $125,000 in the general election to $151,000 in the primary or $189,000 in the general.

The proposed changes would also reduce how much of each eligible donation the city would match, going from $250 for City Council races to one-seventh of the maximum contribution allowed. For the City Council, the maximum contribution allowed is $800, making the eligible amount for matching funds around $115.

“This campaign finance reform measure aims to empower our communities and reduce the influence of special interests and large, private donors in our local elections,” Councilman Paul Krekorian said in October. “By increasing the public matching funds rate, we are strengthening an important mechanism gives regular Angelenos more say in the democratic process.”

The City Council recently approved other changes to the matching funds rules, including reducing the number of required donations from 200 to 100 and requiring participation in a town hall or debate where candidates take questions from the public. Before the October vote, candidates only had to agree to debate their opponents, but participating in a debate or town hall with questions posed by the public was not required.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.