The Los Angeles County supervisors voted Tuesday to fight “skyrocketing rental rates” by finding policies to expand affordable housing and protect renters.

Supervisor Hilda Solis recommended the study.

“Countless residents in the unincorporated areas of my district have experienced skyrocketing rental rates in their neighborhoods,” she said. “We need more tools to secure housing stability for the most vulnerable county residents.”

The work will begin with a survey of rental housing stock; relevant laws and regulations; and best practices designed to protect rental rates, tenant tenure, habitability and freedom from discrimination.

“There’s not a one-size-fits-all approach,” Solis said, but responded to complaints from landlord associations by saying, “We’re not talking about rent control.”

Advocates said tenant protections stabilize families and communities.

“Protecting tenants is an effective homelessness prevention strategy,” Antonio Hicks of the pro bono law firm Public Counsel told the board.

Supervisor Sheila Kuehl, who co-authored the motion, said despite the county’s success in finding homes for roughly 14,000 homeless individuals in 2016, “It’s like trying to bail out a boat. When you see the new homeless count, you won’t think we housed anybody.”

Landlords and real estate agents countered that the high cost of housing was driven a lack of supply and called for the county to streamline approvals and deregulate development.

“Nothing is going to solve the problem other than development,” said Rick Otterstrom, director and past president of the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles.

Otterstrom urged the board to include members of AAGLA and Realtor groups on a task force that will be established as a second phase of the work.

Implementing new policies and advocating for necessary legislative changes could be costly, but the motion offers a solution.

“There need be little or no cost to the county general fund if administrative costs are recovered through a small per-unit fee paid by landlords,” it states.

That suggestion, which was not part of the board’s vote, also prompted landlords to push back.

“Grocery stores aren’t responsible for people starving and landlords aren’t responsible for homelessness,” said Pamela Lawrence, who described herself as a “mom-and-pop” operator. “Please, build more housing. Don’t penalize those of us who already provide it.”

Kuehl said supply is actually booming, but at prices few other than those “who are working for Google and Snapchat” can afford.

“What we really need is affordable housing,” something private developers aren’t building, she said.

She pointed to a study released last week by the California Housing Partnership Corporation that concludes that the county needs to add more than 550,000 affordable homes to meet the current demand among low-income renters.

Supervisor Kathryn Barger said she was concerned about including commercial properties in the scope of the study and asked that the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation be enlisted to offer input on the initial survey work.

A report back is expected in 90 days, at which time a task force will be set up to develop recommendations.

— City News Service

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.