Lamps Plus Inc. is being sued for alleged age discrimination by a former employee who claims the company used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to lay her off in 2020 when she was 60 years old, even though she had a superior knowledge of the business and had trained many who kept their jobs.

Cynthia Bowman’s Los Angeles Superior Court lawsuit also alleges wrongful termination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of an implied contract and failure to prevent discrimination, harassment and retaliation. She’s seeking unspecified damages in the suit filed Friday.

A Lamps Plus representative could not be immediately reached for comment.

Bowman was hired by Lamps Plus as an administrative assistant in the buying department in September 2000 and seven years later was promoted to senior executive administrative assistant, in which she managed all logistical arrangements, according to her court papers.

Bowman says she made all travel arrangements for the buyers and set up their attendance at sales events nationwide. She also undertook payroll and timekeeping for the buying department, according to the suit, which says Bowman frequently performed the duties of assistant buyers and buyers in her own and various other departments throughout her 20 years with Lamps Plus.

“Bowman was capable of performing, and had often performed, her own job as well as the duties of assistant buyers and buyers,” the suit says. “Bowman even frequently trained buyers and assistant buyers, among other personnel.”

Last March 19, Lamps Plus CFO Clark Linstone emailed employees that due to California’s Safer-at-Home order issued in response to the pandemic, some employees would be required to work from home, including Bowman, the suit states.

Then, on March 27, a human resources employee called Bowman and told her she was “one of several employees being laid off as a result of economic issues caused by the … COVID-19 pandemic,” according to the suit.

Bowman had more seniority than nearly all her colleagues and was “stunned,” the suit says.

” She had dedicated over 20 years of her life to the company and knew its business inside and out,” according to her suit, which says all Bowman could say to the human resources employee was, “Why me?”

Bowman says she later learned that younger Lamps Plus employees, many of whom she had trained, kept their jobs.

“Bowman could not understand why the company had chosen to lay her off while retaining the younger, less experienced employees,” according to the suit. “Bowman believed that Lamps Plus had chosen to lay her off, in addition to laying off several other older employees, due to her age.”

Bowman has suffered losses from past and future income and employment benefits, stock options and damage to her career, according to her suit.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *