To limit the spread of the coronavirus in jails statewide by limiting the number of inmates, California’s Judicial Council moved Monday to set bail at zero for most misdemeanor and lower-level felonies.

During a teleconference still underway Monday afternoon, the council considered 11 emergency rules designed to ensure public safety in the courts and jails while preserving civil rights.

As Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye opened the session, she said the group was working swiftly, but deliberately.

“(We are) trying our best to preserve rights and ultimately preserve lives,” the chief justice said. “We are at this point truly with no guidance in either history, law or precedent. And to say that there is no playbook is a gross understatement of the situation.”

The council’s first vote was to suspend foreclosures and evictions statewide, as a way to reinforce Gov. Gavin Newsom’s executive order to delay such actions against California renters and homeowners.

All of the rules under consideration came at the request of Cantil-Sakauye, the council chair, and by recommendation of the chairs of six internal committees, according to the posted agenda.

“The Judicial Council should take these temporary actions in order to protect the health and safety of the public, court employees, attorneys, litigants, and judicial officers, as well as staff and inmates in detention facilities, and law enforcement during the state of emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic,” the chief justice stated in her request.

Other proposed emergency rules would require local courts to set up remote hearings via technology and allow counsel to appear on behalf of defendants in pretrial proceedings — as part of a bid to limit the number of people in courtrooms. The council is also considering actions designed to prioritize some hearings — including juvenile proceedings — while postponing less pressing matters.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey praised the move to reduce bail statewide, noting that Los Angeles County implemented its own similar measure last week.

“I applaud the chief justice and the Judicial Council for adopting a statewide zero bail for people charged with most misdemeanors and low-level felonies,” Lacey said in an email to City News Service. “In Los Angeles County, we implemented a zero-bail measure last week that allows us to further reduce the number of people in county jails and courthouses. I appreciate the collaboration among criminal justice leaders in Los Angeles County that has resulted in the rapid deployment of new and innovative approaches as we work to try to stop the spread of COVID-19 in our community.”

The president of the L.A. County Public Defender Union, Nikhil Ramnaney, called the change to bail schedules statewide an important step. But he also noted that it applies only to new cases.

“It still leaves thousands of people in local custody throughout the state who were arrested and had bail set prior to the amendment,” Ramnaney said. “We need to make sure that these people — charged with identical offenses and who do not pose any risk to public safety — are expedited for release. We believe that cash bail is clearly discriminatory against indigent persons and these discriminatory effects have been especially demonstrated during the emergency.”

This is the second emergency meeting of the Judicial Council. On March 23, Cantil-Sakauye suspended all jury trials in California’s superior courts for 60 days to allow courts to immediately adopt new rules to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

That same day, Los Angeles County Superior Court Presiding Judge Kevin C. Brazile signed an order restricting access to all Los Angeles County courthouses to judges, commissioners, court staff and authorized people — including members of the media — until further notice, while also mandating social distancing of at least 6 feet.

Two days later, Los Angeles-based unions representing prosecutors, public defenders and city attorneys called for a complete closure of local courts, claiming the mandate was not being followed and blasting the superior court’s failure to accommodate appearances by phone and video conference.

The Judicial Council is expected to pass rules designed to solve those problems, although implementation at the local level may still take some time. Ensuring that teleconferencing technology is secure is one hurdle cited by a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Multiple members of the council also acknowledged that more changes were likely as conditions change and that the full range of concerns will not be addressed overnight.

“We recognize that these rules don’t even begin to solve all the problems,” said Associate Justice Marsha G. Slough.

The chief justice is expected to summarize the new rules in an order or public statement after the final votes.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.