• Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter

Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Header image

MyNewsLA.comLogo

Breaking news for greater Los Angeles and Orange County

Menu

Skip to content
  • Crime
  • Government
  • Business
  • Education
  • Hollywood
  • Life
  • OC
  • Riverside
  • Weather
  • Dad of Slain Children Claims LAPD, LADCFS Knew Mother was Danger to Their Kids
  • Pacific Theatres and ArcLight Cinemas Won't Reopen
  • Police Seek Assistance to Locate Missing 69-Year-Old Woman
  • Sheriff's Department Seeks Help to Find 75-Year-Old Man Last Seen in La Mirada
  • Plaintiffs in Homelessness Lawsuit Ask Judge to Order L.A. Skid Row Clean-Up

Home » Crime » This Article

Supervisors Reject Changing Cannabis Zoning Regulations

Posted by Contributing Editor on May 19, 2020 in Crime | Leave a response
Share this article:
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

In a 3-2 vote, the Board of Supervisors Tuesday rejected a proposal to reduce zoning requirements for commercial cannabis operations in Riverside County, based on concerns that too many in one space might negatively impact other businesses in the immediate vicinity.

Following a roughly two-hour hearing, the board denied a proposed change to Ordinance No. 348, which requires a minimum 1,000-feet buffer for cannabis outlets in unincorporated communities that are zoned for commercial use. Approval of the modification would have reduced the buffer to 250 feet.

The proposal was wedded to a conditional use permit application submitted by a cannabis supplier, Excel Riverside, whose proprietor sought to open a 3,950-square-feet marijuana retail outlet near the intersection of Center Street and Iowa Avenue in Highgrove, just east of Riverside.

Because another recently approved cannabis shop is less than a thousand feet away, the board was asked to alter Ordinance No. 348 to relax the buffering requirement, thereby permitting Excel Riverside to open for business.

“This change is not just in my district; it’s countywide,” Supervisor Karen Spiegel said, noting that she supported the proposed operation but didn’t like revising an ordinance exclusively for a single business in one place.

Supervisors Kevin Jeffries and Chuck Washington felt the same way.

“I’m hesitant to jump on this because of the experiences I’ve had in my district,” Jeffries said.

He pointed to the dozens of illegal cannabis dispensaries that at one time propagated in confined areas within the First District, particularly Mead Valley and near Lake Elsinore. The supervisor also believed the proposed change was too soon, with the county’s comprehensive regulatory framework on the books for just over a year and county staff struggling to complete the vetting processes.

“This is a countywide impact, and I’m not ready for 250 feet (separation),” he said. “We’re crawling still. We haven’t started walking with this (regulatory) program.”

Like this story? Don’t miss any breaking news from MyNewsLA.com. Sign up here for your free newsletter.

 

Board Chairman Manuel Perez backed the proposal, citing what he described as the successes in Desert Hot Springs, where cannabis retailers are co-located.

Supervisor Jeff Hewitt agreed, saying rolling back the distance requirements was another means of opening “the free market.”

“Competition is the greatest thing,” Hewitt said. “You can grow marijuana in your home (under Proposition 64). Yeah, there some crime issues in Highgrove, but the applicant here is going to have armed security guards. I am for this.”

Jeffries said he would likely be supportive of a future proposal that allows side-by-side “clustering” of marijuana dispensaries in areas zoned as industrial or light industrial, well away from traditional merchants and residential areas.

“They’re doing it in Lake Elsinore,” he said. “I think we should examine the concept of clustering.”

Jeffries, Washington and Spiegel voted against the proposed ordinance changes and conditional use permit for the business. Hewitt and Perez voted in favor.

It was not immediately clear whether county staff would be bringing forward a clustering proposal for the board to consider in the future.

Supervisors Reject Changing Cannabis Zoning Regulations was last modified: May 19th, 2020 by Contributing Editor

>> Want to read more stories like this? Get our Free Daily Newsletters Here!

Follow us:
Facebooktwitterrss
Posted in Crime | Tagged cannabis, Changing, regulations, reject, supervisors, zoning

Advertisement

Get The Latest News by Email!

Sign up here for our free newsletters. We’ll send you the latest headlines every morning and every weekday afternoon.

 
FORECAST FOR LOS ANGELES
46°
Clear
Feels like: 46°F
Wind: 3mph E
Humidity: 65%
Pressure: 29.82"Hg
UV index: 0
ThuFriSat
66/50°F
75/48°F
70/48°F
Weather forecast Los Angeles, California ▸

Most Popular Today

  • Three Little Kids Watch In Horror As Mobile Home Daddy Murders Mom In Riverside Before Killing Himself 3,400 views
  • Head-On Horror Hurts Eight In Azusa Crash: Two Trapped In Wreckage With Critical Injuries 3,000 views
  • 3 Dead in Possible Street Racing Crash in South Los Angeles 1,800 views
  • Torture Terror For Little Girl, 3, Brother, 11, In Temecula: Evil Foster ‘Mom’ Gets 11 Years To Life 1,600 views
  • Suspect Believed Barricaded in Lancaster Residence Not Found 1,400 views

©2021 CalNews Inc.

Menu

  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service