Alan Thicke’s widow has denied allegations by the dead actor’s sons — including rocker Robin Thicke — that she wants to break her prenuptual agreement while threatening to make the family dispute material for the tabloids, saying the sons are trying to damage her reputation in the media.

The widow “has no intention of filing any legal proceeding to challenge the validity of her prenup,” her lawyer states in his court papers. “The (brothers’) petition served its only purpose: it unfairly smeared Tanya because Alan had the audacity to love her.”

In addition to trying to “smear Tanya in the press,” the brothers also “falsely claim that Tanya threatened to go to the tabloids.”

In May, “Blurred Lines” singer Robin Thicke and his brother, Brennan Thicke, filed a Los Angeles Superior Court petition asking a judge to uphold an agreement their father and his third wife, Tanya Callau Thicke, had agreed to prior to their 2005 wedding. The siblings are co-trustees of the Thicke Living Trust created in March 1998.

The siblings’ court papers allege 41-year-old Tanya Thicke said she would take her claims to the news media unless her community property claims are recognized by the co-trusteees. They claim she is seeking more than what their father left her, which consists of a $500,000 from a life insurance policy, 25 percent of her husband’s personal effects, all the furniture at the actor’s ranch property, all death benefits from his pensions and multiple union memberships and 40 percent of the estate that remained.

But in court papers filed Wednesday, Tanya Thicke’s attorney, Adam Streisand, says the siblings’ allegations are false and that their petition should be dismissed because it seeks relief not available under the state Probate Code.

“Indeed, Tanya has no intention of filing any legal proceeding to challenge the validity of her prenup,” Streisand states in his court papers. “The (brothers’) petition served its only purpose: it unfairly smeared Tanya because Alan had the audacity to love her.”

In addition to trying to “smear Tanya in the press,” the brothers also “falsely claim that Tanya threatened to go to the tabloids,” Streisand states in his court papers.

“The exact opposite is the truth, which is all that Tanya will say since none of this should have appeared in any court filing,” Streisand says in his court papers.

Although she and Thicke signed the prenup just four days before their wedding and she had no legal representation, Tanya Thicke “has no intention of challenging its validity” even though it would have been within her right to do so, Streisand’s court papers state.

The prenup includes a mutual waiver of spousal, support, which was unfair to Tanya Thicke because her husband was worth about $20 million at the time, according to Streisand’s court papers.

“Notwithstanding these and many other problems with this ridiculous prenup, Tanya decided to accept its terms,” Streisand’s court papers state. “She has not contested it and she has not claimed that there was community property of the marriage.”

A hearing on Tanya Thicke’s dismissal motion is scheduled Sept. 14.

Thicke died Dec. 13 at age 69 of a ruptured aorta. He had collapsed while playing ice hockey in Burbank.

—City News Service

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.