juvenile hall
Juvenile Hall - Photo courtesy of Noel V. Baebler on Shutterstock

The Los Angeles Board of Supervisors is expected to ask the Probation Department Tuesday to prepare a report on ways to eliminate delays faced by attorneys, social workers and other professionals trying to visit detainees at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Downey.

The request comes after a Southern California News Group report that some visitors have been forced to wait for as long as three hours.

The Probation Department told SCNG that occasional delays “may occur due to operational factors, daily scheduling and logistical issues.” The agency’s statement said it was seeing a noticeable improvement due to the staff working to reducing wait times, and due to the addition of four booths in the chapel to accommodate attorney-client conferences.

A motion introduced by Supervisors Janice Hahn and Lindsey Horvath notes that the Probation Department has struggled with staffing for years, which impacts the rate at which youth have access to private appointments.

The motion asks for a written report from the department within four weeks with data on the visitor wait times during the past three months, including an analysis of factors contributing to the delay and strategies being implemented to reduce it.

The facility has been under scrutiny since it was reopened last year.

Sixteen probation officers at the facility were placed on leave following an investigation that detected cases of “youth-on-youth violence.” They were among a total of 66 probation officers who have been placed on leave since the beginning of the year for various issues relating to conduct on and off duty.

In February, the California Board of State and Community Corrections declared Los Padrinos and the Barry J. Nidorf Secure Youth Treatment Facility in Sylmar unsuitable to house youths. The state board cited violations ranging from poor staffing levels to inadequate training, education programs, safety plans and disciplinary procedures.

The board reversed that finding in April, determining that sufficient improvements had been made to address the various violations. Had the board not changed its mind, the county would have been forced to close the facilities and relocate the youth detainees.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *