The Federal Trade Commission, along with the district attorneys of Los Angeles and Riverside counties and attorneys general in several states, Wednesday sued internet service provider Frontier Communications, alleging the company charged subscribers for faster digital service than was provided.
The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles federal court, seeks to revise Frontier’s alleged business practices and reimburse customers who paid for speeds the company allegedly didn’t deliver.
The FTC alleges Frontier “did not provide many consumers with the maximum speeds they were promised, and the speeds they actually received often fell far short of what was touted in the plans they purchased.”
Frontier denied the claims, issuing a statement maintaining that the complaint includes “baseless allegations, overstates any possible monetary harm to Frontier’s customers and disregards important facts,” including that the company’s DSL speeds have been “clearly and accurately articulated, defined and described” in its marketing materials and disclosures.
In the complaint, the FTC and its partners allege that Connecticut-based Frontier advertised and sold Internet service in several plans, or tiers, based on download speed. Frontier has touted the tiers using a variety of methods, including mail and online ads, and has sold them to consumers over the phone and online.
The FTC’s complaint was filed with attorneys general from Arizona, Indiana, Michigan, North Carolina and Wisconsin, as well as the district attorneys’ offices of Los Angeles County and Riverside County on behalf of the state of California.