A few days after reaching agreement with the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, the U.S. Department of Justice Friday reached a similar accord with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department related to the use of jailhouse informants, ending an investigation that stemmed from a scandal related to the prosecution of Scott Dekraai, the worst mass killer in county history.
The two agreements mirror each other for the most part. The agreements come two years after a damning report analyzing the abuses with informants by sheriff’s investigators and prosecutors in the case against Dekraai for the Seal Beach hair salon massacre.
Dekraai, who pleaded guilty to the mass killing, avoided the death penalty as a result of the misconduct and was sentenced to multiple terms of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
The Department of Justice began the investigation into the use of informants Dec. 15, 2016.
“We applaud the sheriff for his proactive efforts instituting key improvements to prevent the misuse of custodial informants at the Orange County Jails and to assist prosecutors in meeting their fundamental disclosure obligations while pursuing justice,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement. “The robust and transparent validation measures in today’s agreement will strengthen the public’s trust in the Sheriff’s Department and uphold the constitutional rights of criminal defendants in custody. The sheriff’s cooperation and adoption of reforms have helped narrow the scope and expected duration of the out-of-court agreement and, together with a related agreement reached with the Orange County District Attorney, will provide for continuation of the necessary collaboration and information sharing.”
The misconduct in the Dekraai case involved placing informants near the defendant to solicit incriminating statements even though he was represented by an attorney, which is illegal.
The agreement comes as a San Diego County Superior Court judge overseeing an evidentiary hearing alleging misconduct in a Sunset Beach murder from 1988 is expected to soon rule whether the case will be thrown out or sanctions will be placed on prosecutors.
The case against Paul Gentile Smith in the 1988 killing of 29-year-old Robert Haugen was reassigned to San Diego County Superior Court Judge Daniel B. Goldstein because the claims of governmental misconduct involve Orange County Superior Court Judge Ebrahim Baytieh when he prosecuted Smith.
The reforms involve more training of investigators and prosecutors regarding the use of informants as well as generating an easier-to-use database of evidence for defense attorneys to search for relevant information.
The sheriff’s agreement focuses on reforms to the way it documents, stores and hands over evidence to attorneys. A common complaint among defense attorneys is having to delve through a mountain of evidence that is difficult to sift through. The disorganized flow of evidence became a central theme in the Smith evidentiary hearing with Goldstein expressing surprise at how dysfunctional it had become.