Jurors will return to a downtown Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday to deliberate the fate of “That ’70s Show” actor Danny Masterson, who is charged with raping three women in his Hollywood Hills home between 2001 and 2003.

During closing arguments of the trial Tuesday, a prosecutor said Masterson used “force, fear or threats” to sexually assault the women and should be convicted of rape. But his attorney countered that the alleged victims lied about their relations with the entertainer.

Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller told jurors that for Masterson, “no never meant no.” Although the actor “looks like a well-groomed gentleman” in court, “he looks very different” to his alleged victims, the prosecutor said.

“If you were a young woman, you were far from safe,” Mueller said. “If you were incapacitated in his bed, he would rape you. If you were at his home and you were not yet intoxicated, he would offer you the alcohol to get you there and he would forcibly rape you. And if you were in a relationship with him, he would control you.”

In arguing for a not-guilty verdict, defense attorney Philip Cohen said the prosecution wanted to “win this case so badly” that they ignored “blatantly fabricated” and inconsistent testimony from witnesses during the nearly month-long trial.

“It’s not just maddening, it’s horrifying,” Cohen said of the case against his client, adding that the alleged victims “have motivations to lie” on the witness stand.

Masterson, a 46-year-old longtime adherent of the Church of Scientology, is charged with three counts of rape by force or fear involving the three women. The actor declined to take the stand in his own defense.

The Los Angeles Superior Court jury was handed the case at the end of the court day Tuesday with deliberations scheduled again Wednesday morning.

In his closing argument, Mueller reminded the jury of the testimony of the alleged victims, known by the initials C.B., J.B. and N.T.

J.B., for example, testified that she had gotten drunk on vodka that Masterson had given her and was subsequently “dragged” into the shower, where she swung at him as he washed her breasts with soap, the prosecutor said.

The woman was eventually taken to Masterson’s bed, where she passed out — and woke to find her fellow Scientology member on top of her, according to Mueller.

The woman also testified that she grabbed the back of the actor’s hair and pushed a pillow into his face as he penetrated her, adding that Masterson shoved the pillow back in her face with all of his body weight on her and that she felt she was being smothered, Mueller said.

Cohen responded that J.B. had not been truthful about the sexual encounter.

Masterson was charged in 2020 with forcibly raping the women in separate incidents between 2001 and 2003. The alleged rapes took place at his home.

In his summation, Masterson’s attorney used cardboard exhibits to illustrate the concept of reasonable doubt, urging jurors to bear in mind the presumption of innocence when they start deliberating.

“The decision you make in this case is one of the most important decisions of your life,” he said.

Masterson has been free on bail following his arrest by the Los Angeles Police Department’s Robbery-Homicide Division.

In December 2017, Netflix announced that Masterson had been fired from the Emmy-winning scripted comedy “The Ranch” amid sexual assault allegations.

The actor said then that he was “very disappointed” and “it seems as if you are presumed guilty the moment you are accused.” He also “denied the outrageous allegations” and said he looked forward to “clearing my name once and for all.”

A civil suit filed in August 2019 against Masterson and the Church of Scientology by the three women involved in the criminal case and one woman who was not a member of the church alleges they were stalked and harassed after filing sexual assault allegations against the actor with Los Angeles police.

The District Attorney’s Office declined to file sexual assault charges against Masterson in two other alleged incidents, citing insufficient evidence on one and the statute of limitations on the other.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *