A proposed county parcel tax to bankroll projects aimed at capturing, cleaning and conserving stormwater to prevent it from running downstream and polluting rivers and beaches appeared to be heading for passage Wednesday and county officials hailed the outcome.
Measure W, dubbed the Safe Clean Water Program — expected to raise $300 million annually — needs the backing of two-thirds of voters to be approved. With all precincts reporting from Tuesday’s election, the measure had 67.5 percent of the vote. Given the likely large number of provisional and mail ballots that still need to be tallied, however, the final tabulation may not be available for weeks.
But county officials are already enthusiastically looking forward to implementation.
Supervisor Sheila Kuehl, who took the lead in moving the measure through the board process, spoke Wednesday morning with City News Service.
“I think it’s a really wonderful thing for the county, probably even better than people know, because they don’t know how threatened our water supplies are,” Kuehl said. “Having local water, billions of gallons, recovered and recaptured and back into the ground water, it’s really important.”
The chief engineer for the county’s flood control district, Mark Pestrella, also seemed to consider the measure won.
“Voters have embraced an historic opportunity to modernize L.A. County’s infrastructure to meet the needs of the 21st century,” Pestrella said in a statement.
Each of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County is under a federal mandate to comply with the federal Clean Water Act, but lacked the resources to do the work. Half of the money raised under Measure W will go to collective watershed projects that involve multiple jurisdictions.
“Measure W will help us manage scarce water resources more effectively for our children and our children’s children,” Kuehl said. “L.A. County currently loses an estimated 100 billion gallons or more of water during annual rainstorms, enough to meet the needs of more than 2.6 million for an entire year. We simply can’t afford to let that water run down the drain.”
Passage would clear the way for planning on big projects that Kuehl said will create lots of jobs in the building trades.
She told CNS she’d like to see more of those opportunities and other construction jobs go to qualified women and is talking with trade unions and guilds to persuade them to provide more training and remove barriers to employment.
“It’s not just women, but there’s like 50 percent of the population who could do this work, who needs the work,” Kuehl said.
Kuehl and dozens of environmental advocates said the measure would both increase local water supplies and improve water quality, while prioritizing projects that have added benefits such as creating additional green space and protecting wildlife.
Shelley Luce, president and CEO of the nonprofit Heal the Bay, argued the measure would “save millions of dollars of taxpayer dollars” by putting the county in compliance with the federal Clean Water Act.
Opponents have criticized the proposal for adding yet another tax in an already expensive housing market. They also complained the measure does not have a sunset clause, creating a “forever tax.”
In 2013, an effort by then-Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky to pass a parcel tax was abandoned in the face of strong opposition from business owners, school districts and some cities that said it duplicated their own efforts.
But supporters say Measure W is designed to reflect how heavily individual property owners rely on county flood control systems. It would charge 2.5 cents per square foot of “impermeable areas” such as concrete roofs, driveways and sidewalks that contribute to runoff. Yards and other green space, where stormwater is absorbed rather than running into drainage systems, are not included in the calculation.
The median tax is estimated at $83 per year and interested property owners can calculate their bill at www.safecleanwaterla.org. The site relies on GIS mapping to identify hard-scaped areas versus green space.
Schools would be exempt from the tax.
Supervisor Kathryn Barger cast the lone vote against putting the measure on the ballot, saying she was concerned about the burden on property owners, particularly in light of a potential future parcel tax to fund a structural deficit in the county fire department, and potential upward pressure on rental rates.
Barger said complying with federal laws that carry hundreds of millions of dollars in potential penalties is one thing, but she argued the measure goes above and beyond what is required.
“The proposed initiative far exceeds the requirements of the MS4 permit which governs pollutant levels in local waterways,” Barger said. “The permit is based on assumptions that are antiquated and require updating before we go to the taxpayers for more money.”
The county has been out of compliance for years with federal stormwater requirements, though it has largely avoided fines through good-faith efforts to solve the problem.
Those efforts were not enough for the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper, which sued the county in a case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2014 and ultimately held the county responsible for cleaning up the Los Angeles and San Gabriel rivers.
Untreated stormwater and urban runoff into the region’s two main waterways have resulted in excessive levels of aluminum, copper, cyanide, zinc and fecal bacteria. Those rivers drain into Santa Monica Bay and the Pacific Ocean, leaving areas near storm drains closed to swimmers and surfers after heavy rains.
If ultimately passed, the tax would be allocated 50 percent to watershed agencies for regional water projects, 40 percent to cities for local priority projects and 10 percent to the county flood control district for educational programs and administration.
>> Want to read more stories like this? Get our Free Daily Newsletters Here!Follow us: