Photo by Edgar Zuniga Jr./CC-BY-ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/, via flickr.
Photo by Edgar Zuniga Jr./CC-BY-ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/, via flickr.

The future of plastic grocery bags in California will be in the hands of voters Tuesday, when they weigh in on a referendum challenging a statewide ban on the bags and on a separate initiative redirecting money collected by stores from the sale of carry-out bags to a fund supporting environmental projects.

Proposition 67 will allow voters to decide if grocery stores and other selected retail outlets should be banned from handing out single-use plastic bags, but permitted to sell recycled paper bags and reusable bags for a minimum of 10 cents.

The state Legislature approved the ban and the governor signed it into law in 2014, but a referendum forced the issue onto the ballot. A yes vote will uphold the ban, while a no vote will reject it.

Stay updated on the November election and upcoming results! Sign up now for MyNewsLA.com’s daily email newsletter. It’s FREE!


Opponents of the ban say it amounts to a tax increase by charging shoppers 10 cents for a bag, amounting to about $300 million a year that goes back into the pockets of grocers. Proponents, however, say the referendum was mounted by out-of-state plastic-bag manufacturers looking to protect their profits.

Many California cities and counties, including Los Angeles, have adopted plastic bag bans that are already being enforced.

Meanwhile, voters will also decide on Proposition 65, which would legislate the use of money raised by the statewide ban. Passage of the initiative would potentially result in the several tens of millions of dollars annually being transferred to a special fund administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board for certain environmental and natural resources purposes, according to an analysis conducted by the Legislative Analyst’s Office and Department of Finance.

Opponents of Prop 65 also contend that the bag-manufacturing companies are behind the initiative, which they claim was created for the sole purpose of confusing voters and will do little to help the environment.

–City News Service 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *